Property boom in Himachal


HIMALAYAN hill stations built by British colonial officers to shelter them from the fierce Indian summer and remind them of home are to be restored to their former glory by a new generation of middle-class Indians eager to savour a similar lifestyle.

Government officials in Himachal Pradesh, home to some of the most evocative Raj summer towns, including Simla, Dalhousie and McLeod Ganj, have lifted a ban on outsiders owning homes.

Property developers and members of Delhi’s increasingly affluent middle classes are queuing up to restore the faded grandeur of Himachal Pradesh’s many Victorian summer houses, and to build new bungalows based on original designs.

The rehabilitation of one of the most enduring symbols of colonial domination reflects the increasing confidence of India’s middle classes and a previously suppressed admiration for the style in which the British lived.

Prices are rising fast. A three-bedroom bungalow in need of some restoration will fetch about £70,000, while a 10-bedroom house recently sold for £300,000.

Hill stations such as Simla and Darjeeling in the northeast were “discovered” in the mid-19th century by British officers who saw them as ideal family summer retreats from the heat and dust of the plains.

Gothic churches with stained glass windows were built along with schools, racecourses, cricket grounds and private clubs for officers, tea planters and their wives.

From 1864 to independence in 1947, Simla was India’s summer capital. Admirers argue over whether the British were trying to recreate home counties England or Highland holiday towns. Many houses have features of both. What made them different were the verandas, where the colonials would recline on teak and cane chairs, sipping a gimlet (gin and lime) as they looked out over the snow-capped peaks of the high Himalayas.

According to Ruskin Bond, an author who was born to British parents in India and has lived most of his life in Simla and Mussoorie hill stations, each town had a different reputation.

“Mussoorie was a quite raffish, gay place in the old-fashioned sense. Hotels like the Savoy had dances and balls where the Indian princes would come,” he recalled.

“Mussoorie had a racier social life than Simla, where the viceroy was looking over your shoulder – you had to be on your best behaviour. If you wanted a mistress tucked away, you came to Mussoorie.”

Himachal Pradesh had banned outside buyers to protect the interests of local inhabitants, but officials are now anxious not to miss out on India’s property boom.

Y R Sharma, the housing secretary, said developments would have to be sensitive to the heritage. “The Raj heritage is a big attraction for many people. We are still carrying forward British traditions, British manners here.”

Deependra Singh Rathore, a Delhi developer, is planning to build an apartment and cottage complex modelled on Simla’s Viceregal Lodge. “Any building by a Britisher in India is excellent, we love the design and the lifestyle that went with it,” he said.

“Our parents were influenced by the British — the way they dressed, the morning cup of tea. We shouldn’t shy away from it, they did it well. I’m now targeting [Indian] people who want to live that life too.”

For more, CLICK HERE .

Previous articleShimla taxi drivers on strike for the third day
Next articleShambala: A mythical land in Himachal; or is it in Tibet?

No posts to display


  1. This is an interesting story. Most of these homes are located at the best locations in these towns and cities, therefore fetching better margins

  2. This is a bad decision if this happens at all – Properties in Himachal are still unaffordable for the local population and they save their life's earning – may be for just a 10 Lakh Rs House and sometimes are not even able to buy that and a business man from Punjab/Delhi throw away that much amount of money easily and buy couple of flats – some times just for the fun of their teenagers (Take Solan as an example) thereby leading to again a rise in the property rates and make it even more difficult for the local guys to buy a house.

    Moreover due to these demands – the builders remove or just shave away the arrays of forest trees to build more n more and earn huge profits . The actual purpose of having a property in the hills would be defeated one day as the due to the heavy construction activities already the mercury is soaring in Shimla .

    People are already suffering due to wrong policies of the Successive governments – Which is derived from the commercial aspects and not development aspects

    It would be best to let the hills be hills and not a commercial hotspot – Let atleast some places not be robbed of their natural beauty and not be the target of human land greed. I hope section 118 remains intact and is the law is made more strict.

Comments are closed.