Lack of transparency in land acquisition, dark side of development in Himachal

3

HimVani

Solan: If class struggle of the kind championed by politically oriented trade unions and farmer unions has defined the nature and course of struggle against land acquisition in different parts of India, then here in Himachal it is the alleged hegemony of industries that is setting the agenda.

Dying for an industrial revolution to join the mainstream of development, it is being said the state has, in a way, surrendered to industrial houses to explore, ‘exploit’ business prospects here.
The alleged forced eviction and land acquisition by JP Industries in the Mangal area of Arki tehsil for its cement plant is a direct outcome of the state’s indecisiveness in dealing with the problem. And with the villagers threatening to go to any extent not to allow the setting up of the proposed cement factory in case they were not given compensation and rehabilitated properly, the coming days would be testing times for the government.

Apparently, consciously or sub-consciously not understanding the needs and aspirations of the local people, or not learning from the strife caused by land acquisition in other states, these industrial house have somehow sowed the seeds of discontent in Himachali landowners as well. Though the previous government tried to play safe by going soft on SEZs after declaring them with much gusto, and the current government too does not seem to be interested in disturbing the Hornet’s nest, big projects coming up in the state are doing enough to stir controversy.

In this case villagers are alleging that JP Industries was forcibly evicting people from their houses with the help of the police. Alleging that even bulldozers were used to pull down their houses and cattle sheds, people are claiming that they have not been given the compensation amount, which they claim is anyway too less.

Besides the issue of adequate compensation, the local people have always been opposing these projects on environmental grounds. Now is this opposition coming up solely for increasing the stakes to get more compensation, or are there genuine reasons behind it?
There is no doubt that most of the developmental work in hills come at the cost of some compromise on the environment front, but boom in the real estate business too had raised the aspirations of landowners, even in far-flung areas.

The solution lies in not to suppress the conflict by ignoring its presence, but to recognize the ground realities to take them into consideration while commissioning big projects. The major reason behind discontent among different stakeholders is lack of transparency both by the government and the company executing the project. And to improve on this front, the government and the major stakeholders will have to cover quite a distance to search a level playing field.

Previous articleWater Water Everywhere
Next articleA ray of hope for thalassaemia patients in Himachal

No posts to display

3 COMMENTS

  1. Such opinion based posts need a byline, otherwise they lack creditability.

    As a news report, it quoths nobody.

  2. It is true that Land is needed for putting up Industry, and Land costs stretching upto 25-45 % of Projects costs, leave Industrtialists to go elsewhere, where they find land costs between 7-15 %.

    Why should any Industry come to Himachal, when Govt. is not clearly striking a balance, leaving it to the jaws of farmers who seek land rates which even do not prevail in NOIDA Delhi or Bombay. In one classic Example, a company offering Rs.1.5 Crores for a Hect, but villagers are asking for 10 crores per hect. for their agriculture land.

    Who will strike the balance?

    If U say that in Open market economy, Industry has to buy the land at WHATEVER PRICE, then I am afraid u must also stop crying when cement SELLS AT RS.1000 a bag.

    Is this not funny, Govt. officials donot collect the wisdom and tell the farmers that company is paying well, and if any refinement is desired it will be done, but asking for 500-600 % is not tolerable.

    We should be ready to REAP WHAT WE SOW. – SSJ

  3. Such a view point is kinky. In agriculture production system even a straw is not wasted as it goes as cattle feed , refuse goes as manure/fertilizer and source of energy. If an Agriculturist has 2 milch animals and no land, even then he can sustain generations as he has access to common land , pasture, userfructury rights ,right to minor produce. All these are losses for the purposes of acquisition, quantifyable losses as per provision of sec 23 of Land Acquisition Act. Corporates must realize the trauma say if entire established Factory land of Honda at Gurgaon is notified to be acquired for establishment of a Cancer Hospital , I would like to know as to whether Honda without recourse to courts through its might of economic power settle for Market Rate as notified by Collector Gurgaon ? Please respond . Life is all about propotionalities. Have a fair view ….and the stated position of the Govt and people of H.P. couldn`t have been more right. Vijay Chandan

Comments are closed.